Dispelling the Myth: Faith No More
Monday July 14th 2008,
Filed under: Dispelling the Myth, Features

I’ve found that in my few years’ worth of experience in listening, writing, and reading about music, there are always going to be a handful of bands or artists that possess a curiously elusive quality in regards to the unwavering devotion of their fanbases. Bands that during the course of a conversation will provoke a raised-eyebrow statement of, “Oh, sure, Band X, they’re okay, but… they’re your All Time Favorite group?” I can understand, say, someone’s fervor towards a juggernaut like U2: they have dozens of successful singles, sold millions of records around the world, and have stuck with the same anthemic, fist-in-the-air, hook-filled formula for three decades now. Not really my cup of tea, but I could easily envision someone building a shrine to the group in a corner of their living room. I’m talking about bands like Echo and The Bunnymen. New Order. Hell, Radiohead, for that matter. (I’ll save The Sex Pistols for another time.) All groups who have had their moments, to be sure, but when the landscape of their discographies is viewed from a distance, those not blinded by their own rabid fandom would see maybe a peak or two, but far too many valleys – and in some cases, miles of barren wasteland. For me, Faith No More fall into this category.

Few collectives since the birth of rock ‘n roll have inspired such a cultish throng of hyper-obsessive acolytes (or Pattolytes, if you will) like Faith No More. Hopefully they’ll have reached this part of the post to read my disclaimer instead of immediately scrolling down to the comments section to expound a litany of obscenities and threats directed solely at my personal well-being: I like Faith No More. Shit, I used to love the band. I still get goosebumps from Mike Bordin’s drumming (see here). Bass players don’t get much more solid than Billy Gould. Roddy Bottum still holds one of the best monikers in rock music (say it out loud, and insert a “fuckin’” in there for maximum effect). But as I get older, the more I question the soundness of my rampant enthusiasm for the group during my musical coming-of-age back in the ‘90s. A cursory examination of Faith No More’s six full-length studio records over the course of their roughly a decade-and-a-half existence reveals the following: a phenomenal “classic” record, a decent but lesser “breakthrough” album, two barely passable and seriously flawed attempts in genre-hopping, and two rank, steaming piles of drivel that are essentially unlistenable to these ears. Not exactly an All Star-worthy batting average. Does this sound like a group who deserve the massive truckloads of reverence and acclaim that’s still heaped upon them to this day, ten years after their disbandment?

The core of Faith No More – bassist Billy Gould, drummer Mike “Puffy” Bordin, keyboardist Roddy Bottum, and guitarist Jim Martin – was formed in San Francisco in the mid-‘80s. After a revolving door of singers (most infamously Courtney Love) the band inexplicably settled on Chuck Mosely, a walking trainwreck of a vocalist who was one part surfer burnout, one part pseudo-rapper, and about ten parts drug-binge hangover. During these formative years the group’s sound was basically a heavier kind of party-hardy funk, anchored by Bordin’s thunderous drums and Gould’s popping bass, and punctuated by Martin’s thin, buzzing guitar and Bottum’s simple string-pad flourishes. It wasn’t exactly an original or complex formula, but it was about the only thing that worked with Mosely’s semi-retarded barks acting as vocals. Other than the title track, debut We Care a Lot (1985) is entirely forgettable, an insipid, throwaway mess of lightweight, one-note-riffing funk-metal. Follow-up Introduce Yourself (1987) benefited from slightly stronger songwriting and a fuller production, but Mosely’s obnoxious, ham-fisted presence is unavoidable; there’s just no getting around the guy. The band got more mileage out of “We Care a Lot,” reprising it for a single the following year, an anthem that would have forever rendered Faith No More to “one-hit novelty” had the members decided to fold and return to their day jobs. Fortunately, Mosely’s days with the group were numbered, and the frontman was sacked shortly after the record release party for the album due to his erratic behavior and excessive drug and alcohol use.

“Anne’s Song” – Faith No More 4:34 (Introduce Yourself, Slash 1987)

So two weeks prior to recording The Real Thing (1989), the band recruited a young Mike Patton to handle vocal duties, recommended by Martin after heard a demo of Patton’s other band, Mr. Bungle. Light years ahead of Mosely, Patton was unquestionably, almost shockingly talented, a vocal chameleon of sorts whose contorted whines, tough-guy roars, and clipped rapping was a perfect match for Faith No More’s new direction, with hooks and intensity in equal measure, livened by a beefed-up production from Matt Wallace to boot. This was the age where an edgy video could propel a band into the stratosphere, and it worked for Faith No More in spades – love it or hate it, everyone remembers the video for “Epic.” Lesser album cuts like the title track and “Zombie Eaters” revealed a depth and focus to the songwriting that had been previously absent from the band’s material, while second single “Falling to Pieces” and “Underwater Love” retained some of the playfulness that characterized their earlier work. To help rein the modern kneejerk criticisms of The Real Thing as “dated,” it’s important to remember that prior to its release, not many bands were combining funk, metal, and hip hop as effectively, for better or worse (accusations of the regrettable birth of the nu-metal that plagued the ’90s aren’t entirely unfounded). Granted, I could happily go the rest of my life without hearing “Edge of the World” or “Woodpecker from Mars” again, but as far as breakthrough albums go, The Real Thing delivers for the most part.

“Zombie Eaters” – Faith No More 5:58 (The Real Thing, Slash 1989)

With The Real Thing’s worldwide sales just shy of four million units, the pressure was on the group to produce a worthy follow-up. Yet no one knew what the hell to make of Angel Dust (1992) when it was released in the summer of ’92. Any buoyant whimsy left over from the previous album was gone, replaced by a darker, warped, almost oppressive atmosphere that confounded critics and alienated fans wanting another “Epic.” The band’s desire to experiment and avoid the carbon-copy follow-up resulted in one of the finest records of the decade, accented by the fact that Faith No More had finally discovered a unique sound that was entirely, sublimely their own. Patton, especially, went from a spandex-clad kid with a funny haircut to a vocal revelation seemingly overnight, jump-cutting from a piercing shriek to a baritone croon in the blink of an eye with breathless dexterity. Angel Dust managed the feat of each track sounding completely unlike the others without the album losing any sense of coherency as a whole: the full-throttle assault of “Caffeine,” the nightmarish sludge metal of “Jizzlobber,” the country-fried trailer-park drama of “RV,” the pulsating funk of “Everything’s Ruined.” Then there are the cuts that defy description, like “A Small Victory” and “Malpractice”; even the inferior tracks like “Crack Hitler” trumped anything the group had recorded to date. Within a few months of its release, it slowly became apparent that Faith No More had unleashed a masterpiece upon the public. The band toured the hell out of the album, working the European summer festival circuit and appearing at outdoor arenas with the likes of Metallica, Soundgarden, and Guns N’ Roses.

“Kindergarten” – Faith No More 4:31 (Angel Dust, Slash 1992)

(As an aside and bonus, here’s the movement from Shostakovich’s String Quartet No. 8 (1960) that was sampled in “Malpractice” [though the band actually used The Kronos Quartet’s version].)

“String Quartet No. 8 – II. Allegro molto” – Dmitri Shostakovich 2:44 (Manhattan String Quartet: String Quartets 3 and 8, Centaur 1986)

Then the problems started. After releasing a Commodores cover as a single (“Easy”), Martin, who for many was the “look” of Faith No More and had publicly expressed his displeasure at the outcome of Angel Dust (he had very little input in the compositional process), was fired under less-than-amicable circumstances. The search for a new guitarist began, with the group welcoming (somewhat reluctantly) Trey Spruance of Mr. Bungle into the fold. King for a Day… Fool for a Lifetime (1995) was written mostly by Gould, Bordin, and Patton – Bottum’s signature keyboards are curiously absent from most of the material (he was reportedly battling drug addiction at the time of the recording). Spruance, one of the most brilliant and mind-warpingly original guitarists of his generation, is sadly relegated to little more than distorted power chords here; it’s genuinely difficult to believe that it’s his playing on the album. Whether he was just out for a paycheck or had a total lack of enthusiasm for the songs is anyone’s guess, but the sound ultimately suffers for it, and one can’t help but long for the color of Bottum’s keys. Lead single “Digging the Grave” was nothing spectacular, suffering from a stripped-down blandness that characterized much of the record. “What a Day,” “Ugly in the Morning,” and “Cuckoo for Caca” are Faith No More-by-numbers, and even some of the riskier songs, like the midnight lounge-soul of “Evidence” and the country twang of “Take This Bottle,” don’t survive more than a few listens. The tracks that work best are the ones that are the least self-conscious, like “Just a Man”’s dub-meets-Gospel-ballad, the collision of showtune funk with a lively brass section on “Star A.D.,” and the atmospheric prog of album centerpiece “King for a Day.” Spruance departed before touring was scheduled to begin to finish work on Mr. Bungle’s magnum opus Disco Volante (1995), and Faith No More was yet again without a guitarist. The band promoted roadie Dean Menta to the guitar slot for the tour and parted ways with him shortly afterward.

“King for a Day” – Faith No More 6:35 (King for a Day… Fool for a Lifetime, Slash 1995)

There are a few items of note at this juncture in the band’s career. For one, their popularity on either side of the Atlantic had see-sawed, with a new legion European listeners following the group’s every move while their prominence in the States had waned. Side projects also began to dominate the lives of each member, with Bordin finding lucrative side work manning the skins for Ozzy, Bottum concentrating on his Imperial Teen, and Patton venturing further into the esoteric abyss with Bungle and solo work for John Zorn’s Tzadik label. Under these circumstances, it’s a miracle that Album of the Year (1997) turned out as well as it did, although the response from the public was generally lackluster. Jon Hudson of Systems Collapse filled in for the role of guitarist for a dozen selections that more or less followed in the anything-goes mold of King for a Day, ranging from some of the group’s finest work (the stunning “Stripsearch”) to miserable, uninspired dirges (“Paths of Glory”). A funereal air of finality – but not quite closure – hangs over the record like a fog, and anyone who had been following the group’s trajectory since the beginning of the decade couldn’t deny their own suspicions that the half-hearted attempt of Album of the Year was a clear signal for an impending breakup. Sure enough, Gould announced the split in the spring of the following year, but by that point, only the diehards were lamenting Faith No More’s disbandment.

“Stripsearch” – Faith No More 4:29 (Album of the Year, Slash 1997)

I’ll admit that much of Faith No More’s material has aged well with time, albeit somewhat peculiarly – Album of the Year becomes exponentially less of the disaster I made it out to be upon its release with each passing year, and there was a point in the late ‘90s when I couldn’t even sit through one song from The Real Thing. With an oeuvre this uneven – let’s not forget those earlier Mosely-fronted outings, much as we’d all like to – and given the patchy, hit-or-miss nature of the group’s later work, I posit my original case: is Faith No More really worthy of Hall of Fame status? I’m certainly up for hearing arguments in their defense.


9 Comments so far
Leave a comment

“Epic” and “Falling To Pieces” left such bad tastes in my mouth, as well as Coby Dix from papa roach’s cosign of Angel Dust that I avoided their records until early last year when I downloaded their best of.

And I stand by that best of. Its fucking fantastic in the chronological sequence its in and there’s only one or two clunkers on it. Their actual albums, however suffer from what I call “90’s recollect”. Its the realization now that a lot of canonically beloved 90’s bands and albums are crap, or at least far from deserving of their mythical stature. Sometimes it just aged badly and its not the fault of the musicians, sometimes, like in this case, its the result of the experimentations being so new and decently pulled off that people don’t realize that maybe they’re not that great.

Basically, if you heard a new style for the first time, it’d probably be worshiped for years for being new, rather than good, even when the second and third wave bands improve upon the design.

Comment by Chris 07.14.08 @

poor fishy.

Comment by duff 07.15.08 @

Cool Aruba picture!

Comment by Pops 07.15.08 @

I think I’m with you on each of the Faith No More records and their overall status as a group. Angel Dust is a classic, but the personnel issues/changes demote those other records into best-of fodder. I think I have a bit more fondness for King for a Day than you do, but it could just be my unrelenting appreciation for the title track and “Evidence.”

If anything, I’d say that Pattonites typically show more devotion for Mr. Bungle, a band that was both weirder and more consistently great (three terrific albums that sound very little like each other). I’ll tentatively take Angel Dust over California or Disco Volante, but I’d much rather get a new Bungle record than a follow-up to Album of the Year.

Comment by Sebastian 07.16.08 @

[…] morning, after years of expecting to stumble onto, I came across this article on the vastly appreciated Faith No More. It was posted on Floodwatchmusic, a really engaging repository of great music and just as great, […]

Pingback by Radiohead, Rajinikanth and stuff « The world according to these fellows 07.20.08 @

My assessment of Faith No More is mostly congruent to yours. The same contradictions that made them so interesting also made them uneven. Basically, I find them under-performing; maybe their live show had more of the schizophrenia that the albums promised but never really delivered. I listened to Angel Dust some time ago and found it suffocated by the keyboards. “A Small Victory”, though, is untouchable. And “King for a Day” - where did they pull that from? Almost too good for the band then.

Comment by Invisible Oranges 07.21.08 @

Agree on most parts . I truly believe that TRT & AD are to be appreciated as masterpieces for different reasons and as for AOTY i’m a little more less critical as some songs really sounded tight like ‘Stripsearch,Ashes To Ashes,Helpless,Pristina and Last Cup Of Sorrow’. Album sales waning were looked upon as a main reason for break-up but i don’t agree as their last 2 album ‘KFAD..FFAL & AOTY’ numbers were below of TRT’s 4mill and AD’s 3mil, they still had healthy numbers in Europe and Australia (around 1,5m each). So yeah to answer your question..They truly are ‘Hall of Famers’.

Comment by ty 07.22.08 @

Introduce Yourself and AOTY have their moments (Crab Song, Paths of Glory, Helpless).

However , the reason people hold them in such high regard is for their three classic albums The Real Thing, Angel Dust and KFAD of the alternative rock genre. These three albums are extremely solid.

A band doesnt need to have sold 30 million albums and had numerous top 10 singles to be any more worthy of appreciation.

Your argument is enitrely objective, in that you are saying “Well if X band brought out 6 conistent albums, but Y band brought only 3 brilliant diverse albums, then why am I listening to band Y?. Music is entirely subjective. Why do Jim Martins guitar lines send shivers down my spine, but Petrucci’s do nothing for me? Petrucci is technically so much better. Music and logic rarely go together. Why are there so many debates about music, its artists, its integrity, rage on and on all over the internet? It is for that reason alone your argument is completely invalid.

If you don’t get the band, fine. But dont try to pass off your opinions as some kind of “truth”. I’ve seen a similar opinion to yours in a review form amazon.com on Angel Dust, enititled “The album we all claimed to like” - again trying to convice that the album people hold in such high regard is not worthy of being called . You’ve done a similar thing, only its with bands entire career.

You sir, are adding to the pile of pointless music discussions which go by “Oh I really like/d band X, but really were they THAT good?” We could criticise Mozart, Beethoven et al if we wanted to.

For the record, the Sex Pistols make unslistenable shit “music”.

U2 are so bland its not even funny.

Comment by Anthony 08.06.08 @

Anthony,

If I was presenting my argument as the “truth,” why bother asking readers to respond with their thoughts/arguments to the contrary?

Here’s how I interpret your flawed mess of an argument: You like Band X. You stumble upon a site of “pointless music discussions” where I criticize Band X and question their oeuvre as a whole, despite explicitly stating at the beginning of my post that I like Band X. You get angry that someone would dare to criticize your precious Band X, claiming my argument about Band X is “invalid” simply because I’m having it.

In the grand scheme of things, I’m not doing anything revolutionary here. I’m simply trying to provoke discussions about music through writing. If you don’t agree, either present your argument with some degree of clarity or simply leave the site. But don’t argue that I can’t criticize a band or their music because “music and logic rarely go together.” Shit, I don’t even know what that means.

Either way, thanks for taking the time to contribute to this “pointless music discussion” which you seem to abhor so passionately. Solidarity on the Sex Pistols, too.

Comment by floodwatch 08.06.08 @



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)